Dimensions of Thinking

Years ago, I had an epiphany about the way my mind works. I am inclined toward three-dimensional ways of thinking. Two-dimensional tasks do not come as easily to me.

For example, some three-dimensional tasks in which I excel and/or enjoy greatly:

  • pottery
  • visualization of the inside of a cell and biomolecules interacting
  • abstract thinking (one reason that I love poetry)
  • sculpture: ceramic and metal (welding)
  • geometry and logic puzzles that involve rotating shapes in the mind

Some two-dimensional tasks that I am terrible at doing, or feel go against my natural abilities:

  • sewing (do not look at the hem of the curtains I tailored)
  • crocheting
  • knitting
  • drawing
  • painting
Scarf. My only completed crocheting work, ever. The varying row length makes it...rustic. Circa 2008.

Three-dimensional pursuits play to my strengths and interests while two-dimensional pursuits leave me floundering and laughing at myself.

I’m not convinced that having either a two-dimensional or a three-dimensional mind is a universal trait. In fact, I believe that people can excel at both. The following painter-sculptors leap to mind:

Clearly, this is my own limitation, not a trait inherent to the human mind.

At this point in my writing, I decided to search to see if anyone had previously made this distinction about a mind’s ability to work in varying dimensions. One painter described that they “sculpt the form on [the] canvas”. The artist was not referring to impasto, but to her method of translating a three-dimensional world on a two-dimensional canvas.

It may be a matter of how one conceptualizes dimensional thought.

Corollary: there may be hope for me yet!

A few days ago I realized just how bad I am at two-dimensional thinking. Sunboy was experimenting with perspective and orientation as he drew a diagonally-facing car. Soon, I was simplifying the shape of a car into one rectangle, one half-circle and two circles and demonstrating how these are drawn differently depending on which direction the car is moving. I went on to show him the typical road with rows of trees on either side, and how the trees are drawn larger to indicate more distance from the viewer. Yes, larger as they became more distant. What I drew for him was this:

Sunboy looked at me funny, but respectfully listened to my art lesson. When I realized what I had done and confessed again to him that I am terrible at drawing, we had a good laugh over mommy’s hopelessly three-dimensional mind.

4 thoughts on “Dimensions of Thinking

  1. I haven’t been entertained more by a post before.
    I have a similar observation to share. I knew I was hopelessly two dimensional in my head only after I enrolled into mechanical engineering. I was made aware of this limitation during my engineering drawing class where I just could not for the life of me imagine anything in three dimensions.
    While other things like painting etc came naturally to me, I always felt lacking as an engineer of a skill that is so so important.
    I always held people who could do a 3 D thinking in their head and thought of them as superior.

    1. Oh, I am so glad that someone understands these ramblings! I don’t think either strength is superior. I’m very impressed with those who can move effortlessly between the two (unlike me).

  2. I shared this on my FB page because finally I think I have found someone who thinks LIKE I do but doesn’t think the WAY I do.

Share your thoughts!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s